2008 Electoral College Prediction - Full Year

From AbulWiki
Note: Live Election Day Updates as Final Polls and Results come in are here:
2008 Electoral College Prediction
Click Above for the Most Current Analysis!


Welcome visitors. In addition to the 2008 election information here, please also check out one or more of the Abulsme.com blog, the Curmudgeon's Corner Podcast, the True Binary Time Clock, the Abulsme Random Spot Tool, the Mathematically Random Trips and the AbulCam. If you find any of this interesting, please do come back.


Electoral College Graph

Electcollmonth.png

(Data is shown since 7 Mar 2008, which was the first day data was available for 50 states.)

Plot shows support lines for both candidates. The scale shown is how many electoral votes away from winning the candidate is if only states with that level of support are included. If the line passes over into the other candidates "side" of the chart, it indicates that candidate is winning. All lines are based on an average of the last five polls in each state.

Note: After 18 Sep 2008, the first date there were polls for DC, the lines for "Obama Lean" and "McCain Lean" would overlap exactly and only one would be visible. From that date forward the lines have been forced slightly apart so they can still both be seen. The actual location of both lines would be the center of the pink/blue band. Prior to that date, the gap between the two lines was real, and represented the fact that there were 3 electoral votes that were not yet predicted by any polls. (Although of course the disposition of DC was never really in doubt.)

Electoral College State Breakdown

McCain Strong McCain Weak McCain Lean Obama Lean Obama Weak Obama Strong

Texas (34)
Tennessee (11)
Alabama (9)
Louisiana (9)
Kentucky (8)
South Carolina (8)
Oklahoma (7)
Arkansas (6)
Kansas (6)
Mississippi (6)
Nebraska (5)
Utah (5)
Idaho (4)
Alaska (3)
South Dakota (3)
Wyoming (3)

West Virginia (5)

Georgia (15)
North Carolina (15)
Indiana (11)
Missouri (11)
Arizona (10)
Montana (3)
North Dakota (3)

Florida (27)
Ohio (20)
Virginia (13)

Pennsylvania (21)
Colorado (9)
Nevada (5)
New Mexico (5)

California (55)
New York (31)
Illinois (21)
Michigan (17)
New Jersey (15)
Massachusetts (12)
Washington (11)
Maryland (10)
Minnesota (10)
Wisconsin (10)
Connecticut (7)
Iowa (7)
Oregon (7)
Hawaii (4)
Maine (4)
New Hampshire (4)
Rhode Island (4)
Delaware (3)
DC (3)
Vermont (3)

127 5 68 60 40 238
132 128 278
200 338
538

Number of electoral votes for each state in parenthesis. 270 electoral votes required to win.

Potential Totals

McCain Obama
McCain Best Case 260 278
Current Status 200 338
Obama Best Case 132 406


The "Best Cases" assume that each candidate gets all of their strong and weak states, along with ALL of the leaning states, even those currently leaning to their opponent. The "Current Status" assumes each candidate gets their strong, weak and lean states. The winner in each scenario is highlighted in green. In a tie, both candidates are highlighted.

Map

Ecmap.png


All Lean states are colored tan. Weak and Strong states are both colored red for McCain and blue for Obama.

Base map from Wikimedia Commons.

Commentary on Graph Updates

For all recent commentary on graph updates see the Electoral College Category on the Abulsme.com blog.

For commentary from specific dates use the links below.

Explanation

This page shows a prediction of the 2008 Electoral College Presidential Vote based exclusively on state by state poll results. Probable results based on previous elections and anecdotal stories of the state's tendencies are not included. The polls include all state based head to head general poll results listed on either pollster.com's poll update page or pollster.com's state by state detail pages. National polls are ignored since the national popular vote is of course irrelevant in a Presidential election. I include all polls from these sources starting from November 5th, 2007... one full year before the 2008 general election.

Support levels are defined as:

  • Lean: 0% ≤ Candidate Lead < 5%
  • Weak: 5% ≤ Candidate Lead < 10%
  • Strong: Candidate Lead ≥ 10%

For purposes of this page, I use the average of the last five polls in each state. In the case where the average of the last five polls shows an exact tie, I will keep the state in the leaning category of whichever candidate was ahead prior to the newest poll pending further polls to pull the state to one side or another.

In cases where the numbers on Pollster's poll update blog differ from the numbers in the state detail page, I will generally prefer the numbers which appeared earlier, unless there is an indication that there was an error which was corrected. In cases where a poll is added to both locations on the same day (common) and they disagree (uncommon) I will prefer the poll update blog to the state detail page. In cases where a poll reports numbers both with and without third parties, I will use the results which include third parties.

I do not use Pollster's trend estimates, favoring the "most recent five polls" approach. There are pros and cons to both methods. I choose the last five polls method basically because when this page was started, Pollster.com trend estimates were not available for most states and it was simple to do. I continued using the same method, because changing mid-stream would make looking at the trends over time less valid. In addition, Pollster.com is creating their own maps based on their trend estimates, and this provides a different view.

The two "lean lines" have met now that there are polls for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

The graphs assume that no third party candidate will enter the race that is strong enough to actually win electoral votes. If that changes, I will remake this page appropriately.

The spreadsheet used to generate these graphs is here.

In response to a discussion on the Straight Dope Message Boards, I've posted an examination of how the results would change on a typical day (18 Oct 2008 in this case) if I used the last 10 days worth of polls rather than the last 5 polls.